I did a quick ChatGPT on your latest proposal + @friedger Identicon for Contracts proposal.
They appear to be complimentary of each other.
“So they complement each other:
Security registry = machine-verifiable security assurance (credentials/trust).
Identicon = human-recognizable visual reference (UX trust).”
“
Which Is Better — Combined or Separate?
Better together.
Separately:*
-
Identicon → visual only (no proof of security)
-
Security registry → machine trust but no UX cue
Together:
-
Visual cues + cryptographically verifiable security
-
Stronger protection against both accidental clicks and malicious copycats
-
Better onboarding and safer UX for end users
This pairing is similar to how modern browsers show:
- a favicon + HTTPS lock icon → quick visual trust + cryptographic identity”
How They Could Be Integrated:
Use the same hash source
Wallet UI / Explorer Flow
Security + UX SIP
You could eventually fold both into a single SIP or companion SIPs